Michael, Just before your commit, the server code was: my $passwordhash = $row->{'pass'}; if (&drupal_password_check($passwordhash, $password)) … sub drupal_password_check { my ($ph,$password) = @_; my $iter_log2 = index($itoa64,substr($ph,3,1)); my $iter_count = 1 << $iter_log2; my $phash = substr($ph,0,12); my $salt = substr($ph,4,8); my $hash = sha512($salt.$password); do { $hash = sha512($hash.$password); $iter_count--; } while ($iter_count > 0); my $encoded = substr($phash . &drupal_password_base64_encode($hash,length($hash)),0,55); return ($encoded eq $ph); } Your change was: # User password encoding function: my $pw_encode = $config->val('db','pw_encode','drupal_password($password)’); … my $passwordhash = $row->{'pass'}; my $encoded = eval $pw_encode; if ($encoded eq $passwordhash) … sub drupal_password { my ($password) = @_; my $iter_log2 = index($itoa64,substr($ph,3,1)); my $iter_count = 1 << $iter_log2; my $phash = substr($ph,0,12); my $salt = substr($ph,4,8); my $hash = sha512($salt.$password); do { $hash = sha512($hash.$password); $iter_count--; } while ($iter_count > 0); my $encoded = substr($phash . &drupal_password_base64_encode($hash,length($hash)),0,55); return $encoded; } You changed the parameters from ($ph,$password) to just ($password), but the drupal_password function still needs to use $ph (the hash) to extract meta data to set the encoding parameters. The problem is that Drupal (and others) has a strong hashing function with multiple iterations. The meta data for that is stored in the password hash itself. The unix crypt library does something similar (with the encoding method and salt stored as meta data in the hash). Just storing passwords as straight hashes (md5, sha1, etc) is fundamentally not secure, as it is trivial to use rainbow tables to break the hashes - so most modern systems use iterations, salts, or other techniques to limit the effectiveness of rainbow tables and make brute force approaches computationally unfeasible. For many systems, we can only encode a password in the same way as a previous encoding if we know the meta data of the previous encoding (and that is stored in the hash). Hence we need the hash as a parameter, to extract the meta data to be able to encode the new password in the same way. This won’t just affect drupal, but any system with a non-trivial password hashing function. So, pw_encode() needs both the old hash as well as the plaintext password to encode. At which point, I think it becomes easier to make it simply pw_check() returning a boolean. It also seems easier to me to do that as a plugin function (pw_check vs pw_encode) as it will allow other non-trivial hashing comparisons if required. For example, say you needed to check the password against an external lookup (ldap, etc). Regards, Mark.
On 21 Feb 2020, at 1:12 AM, Michael Balzer <dexter@expeedo.de> wrote:
Mark,
I did 1b73a7f8 to split the "create & compare password" function into separate "create" & "compare" steps, and introduced the "pw_encode" config hook to be able to supply just a custom "create" operation. That simplifies the config (see example).
That change has been working since 2016 on my server. I see you reintroduced the "create & compare" function as a separate function for the MQTT auth, but don't see why that was needed. I also don't see why the separated function was broken on your server. Can you please elaborate? I'd like to understand what was going wrong.
With reverting to the "create & compare", this breaks the configuration of servers not using Drupal. Essentially, the new "pw_check" hook does just the previous "pw_encode" and adds the comparison to that, so I'd rather opt for adding a default function here that simply reuses the existing "pw_encode" hook.
Regards, Michael
Am 20.02.20 um 04:09 schrieb Mark Webb-Johnson:
Even stranger. This conversation obviously triggered someone to try it and then raise a support ticket that HTTP API authentication didn’t work.
It seems a change was made back in 2016-02-01 23:59:22 (1b73a7f8) that broke the pw_encode function (drupal_password). It was also weird because we had drupal_password and drupal_password_check functions, doing pretty much the same thing (one used by HTTP API and the other by MQ authentication).
I standardised to use a new pw_check (overridable in the config) parameter, which defaults to:
drupal_password_check($passwordhash,$password)
and stopped using the pw_encode config value. I also changed the MQ authentication stuff to use the same pw_check parameter (so both authentication uses are now able to be changed in the same config). If using something other than drupal, just need to change the pw_check parameter in the config.
I realise that this may break other users of the server, but it doesn’t seem a difficult fix to make, and is a much better approach.
Regards, Mark
On 19 Feb 2020, at 1:53 PM, Mark Webb-Johnson <mark@webb-johnson.net <mailto:mark@webb-johnson.net>> wrote:
Strange. I have zero using mine. Must be a EU thing?
I’ll keep it in mind and try not to break anything.
Regards, Mark.
On 18 Feb 2020, at 8:41 PM, Michael Balzer <dexter@expeedo.de <mailto:dexter@expeedo.de>> wrote:
Mark,
grep "main: http" in the log: yes, I've got some users accessing the API frequently.
Usage is mostly /api/charge followed by /api/status & /api/historical, but almost all calls have been used during the last days.
Regards, Michael
Am 18.02.20 um 04:28 schrieb Mark Webb-Johnson:
Is anyone here using the HTTP API at all?
It seems so tied to the v2 protocol, as to not be much use.
Regards, Mark. _______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26 _______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev