There is more to do on this conversion of the Telnet Console to use mongoose: - When wifi service is shut down by command, my old implementation would close the connections to the clients cleanly. The new implementation with mongoose leaves them hanging. The way to improve this may lie in the shutdown steps in ovms_netmanager. - It looks like there may be a memory blocked leaked at each client disconnection. I need to find that. - I think I can improve how I handle the receive buffer and save some more RAM. I've also thought more about how to convert the SSH Console and will take a stab at that as well. -- Steve On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Stephen Casner wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:
We don't seem to have this issue with the webserver listener; that uses mongoose (in netmanager). That doesn't have long-lived client side connections, but the socket listen/accept functionality should be similar. Not sure how mongoose handles it internally, but the library seems quite robust.
Mongoose wakes up from the select() periodically to do polling so the deletion of the task would not happen while in select().
I'm wondering if we can migrate to use that? It would probably save a bunch of ram (as it doesn't need a task for each thread). We are mostly single-user anyway.
I have converted console_telnet to use mongoose and netmanager in the same manner as ovms_webserver. This eliminates the TelnetServer and TelnetReceiver tasks and saves about 3KB. I have kept TelnetConsole as a separate task from NetManTask. I'm not convinced that combining the console functionality into NetManTask is a good idea; I'm afraid it would introduce some problems with interference between various operations and may get into trouble with the Log() mechanism. Even if not, much more surgery would be required.
Perhaps a generic extension to ovms_netmanager where you give it a tcp port and an object type. Then, it listens on that port and launches objects of that type (pre-configured to receive mongoose events as appropriate) for each new connection? Have a base virtual connection class, that gets inherited by each implementation (ssh, telnet, etc).
I didn't do it that way for this telnet conversion, but we could evolve to that if appropriate.
Converting ssh may be possible but would be significantly harder. The libtelnet design calls for all the actual I/O (recv/send) to be done outside of the library. That fits with the design of mongoose where it owns that I/O. However, the wolfssh library is designed for the library itself to be in control of the I/O.
-- Steve _______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.teslaclub.hk http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev