Thanks Michael, will give this a try and report back. On 05.09.2020 16:31, Michael Balzer wrote:
Everyone,
the multi bus polling extension is now merged, and I have just added support for more service types, and requests w/o PIDs and/or with additional non-PID parameters.
This is meant to support e.g. read & clear DTC operations (UDS service types 0x19 & 0x14). I have added some more UDS service types I think might be useful.
Please test & report issues if any.
To add parameter data to a poll entry, use the template shown in vehicle.c:
// const OvmsVehicle::poll_pid_t twizy_poll_default[] = { // { TXID, RXID, VEHICLE_POLL_TYPE_READDTC, {.args={ PID, DATALEN, DATA1, … }}, { 0, 10, 60, 0 }, 0 }, // …
@Soko: this UDS service could be especially useful for you, if the e-Up supports this:
#define VEHICLE_POLL_TYPE_READSCALING 0x24 // UDS: ReadScalingDataByIdentifier (16 bit PID)
If you can get the scaling info for the "weird" Ah & kWh counters, that may give you an exact info on how to interpret these. On decoding the response see the ISO 14229 PDF, section 10.4 and annex C.
Example for a DTC read:
OVMS# xrt obd request bms 19020f Response: 4f 3b 2d 00 48 3a 2d 00 48 53 2d 60 48 54 2d 60 | O;-.H:-.HS-`HT-` 48 02 00 00 48 | H...H
This is a standard DTC response, but the codes are mostly non-standard Renault or LG codes:
4f = StatusAvailabilityMask
3b 2d 00 = DTC #1: P3B2D = unknown: ISO/SAE reserved code … 48 = DTC Status: s.b. -- confirmedDTC + testNotCompletedThisOperationCycle 3a 2d 00 = DTC #2: P3A2D = unknown: ISO/SAE reserved code 53 2d 60 = DTC #3: C132D-60 = custom 54 2d 60 = DTC #4: C142D-60 = custom 02 00 00 = DTC #5: P0200 = "Injector Circuit/Open" (?)
DTC High Byte: bit 7+6: 00 = 'P' (powertrain), 01 = 'C' (chassis), 10 = B (body), 11 = U (network/user) bit 5+4: digit 1: 01 = manufacturer controlled, 00/10/11 = ISO/SAE controlled bit 3-0: digit 2
DTC Status Byte: bit # hex state description 0 0x01 testFailed DTC failed at the time of the request 1 0x02 testFailedThisOperationCycle DTC failed on the current operation cycle 2 0x04 pendingDTC DTC failed on the current or previous operation cycle 3 0x08 confirmedDTC DTC is confirmed at the time of the request 4 0x10 testNotCompletedSinceLastClear DTC test not completed since the last code clear 5 0x20 testFailedSinceLastClear DTC test failed at least once since last code clear 6 0x40 testNotCompletedThisOperationCycle DTC test not completed this operation cycle 7 0x80 warningIndicatorRequested Server is requesting warningIndicator to be active
Regards, Michael
Am 30.08.20 um 09:05 schrieb Michael Balzer:
Merged into the master.
Derek's multi bus polling extension is still in the works and not included in the merge.
Regards, Michael
Am 28.08.20 um 21:15 schrieb Michael Balzer:
Thanks to Soko (UpMiiGo tests) and Thomas (Smart rewrite & tests).
The Smart code makes extensive use of polling, so we're probably good to go.
If other vehicle maintainers would like to test before merging into the master, please let me know.
Regards, Michael
Am 28.08.20 um 15:28 schrieb Soko:
Hi Michael,
I can give you a :thumbup: from the UpMiiGo department. First test of the changes (including a short drive) showed no issues. Neither with the fast-polling nor with the multi-frame-processing with OBDIIEXTENDED.
thanks
Soko
On 27.08.2020 22:00, Michael Balzer wrote:
Everyone,
I've just pushed the poller receiver changes I announced into the new "poller-rework" branch:
https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/commit/0b30...
OBD/UDS Poller Receiver Rework:
- Fix race condition between CAN RX and PollerReceive - Separation of ISO-TP & OBD/UDS layer meta data analysis - Fix incomplete meta data validation - Allow single/multi frame responses on all service types - Validate multi frame response sequences - Fix single frame payload lengths - Fix type 0x22 first frame payload offset & overall length - Add negative response code handling → IncomingPollError() - Add response frame timing control → PollSetResponseSeparationTime()
This rework has been on my list for some time before, as the previous solution had some general shortcomings, especially by it's hard coded coupling of the expected response transport form with the request type, which fails already on some type 0x01 requests.
The major bug in the receiver that now triggered the rework was in the overall payload length calculation and the first frame payload passing of the type 0x22 (VEHICLE_POLL_TYPE_OBDIIEXTENDED) multi frame response handling. That up to now basically only turned up as a visible issue for the Smart ED, as all other vehicles either don't get multi frame responses on 0x22 queries or (like the Kia) generally discard the first frame and don't use the overall length at all.
On the Smart ED, all handlers have been deliberately written assuming the bug was a feature -- all payload addressing is shifted by one byte. This needs to be rewritten now.
All other vehicles should not see any difference and should not need to change any code. Except maybe in the UpMiiGo development, which isn't yet part of the master.
Other bugs like the missing frame sequence validation and late response detection may have been the causes for some spurious and hard to track crashes and data errors. We should try to get this change tested short term on "edge", so we can see if this actually improves stability as I hope.
As this is a major rework (mainly of the PollerReceive() method), audits and tests are very welcome. I can only test on the Twizy, which doesn't make much use of the poller yet.
You can see what the new poller does by raising the log level for "vehicle" to debug. Example of some Twizy regular polling:
D (136323) vehicle: PollerSend(1): send [type=10, pid=C0], expecting 743/763-763 D (136343) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 10(C0) frm=0 len=0 off=0 rem=0 V (136343) v-twizy: OBD2: ignored reply [10 c0] D (137323) vehicle: PollerSend(1): send [type=21, pid=81], expecting 743/763-763 D (137343) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(81) frm=0 len=4 off=0 rem=15 D (137373) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(81) frm=1 len=7 off=4 rem=8 D (137403) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(81) frm=2 len=7 off=11 rem=1 D (137423) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(81) frm=3 len=1 off=18 rem=0 D (137433) v-twizy: OBD2: got VIN='XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX' D (138323) vehicle: PollerSend(1): send [type=21, pid=13], expecting 743/763-763 D (138343) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=0 len=4 off=0 rem=106 D (138373) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=1 len=7 off=4 rem=99 D (138403) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=2 len=7 off=11 rem=92 D (138423) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=3 len=7 off=18 rem=85 D (138453) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=4 len=7 off=25 rem=78 D (138483) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=5 len=7 off=32 rem=71 D (138513) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=6 len=7 off=39 rem=64 D (138543) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=7 len=7 off=46 rem=57 D (138563) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=8 len=7 off=53 rem=50 D (138593) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=9 len=7 off=60 rem=43 D (138623) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=10 len=7 off=67 rem=36 D (138653) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=11 len=7 off=74 rem=29 D (138683) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=12 len=7 off=81 rem=22 D (138703) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=13 len=7 off=88 rem=15 D (138733) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=14 len=7 off=95 rem=8 D (138763) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=15 len=7 off=102 rem=1 D (138793) vehicle: PollerReceive[763]: process OBD/UDS response 21(13) frm=16 len=1 off=109 rem=0 W (141323) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #01: 4/21 rev0 G1 INT MEM Ef| @ 57871km 11kph SOC=60% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255 W (141333) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #02: 4/1 rev0 G1 MEM| @ 57892km -1kph SOC=86% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255 W (141343) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #03: 1/37 rev0 G1 INT MEM Ef| @ 57892km -1kph SOC=86% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255 W (141353) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #04: 3/59 rev0 G2 INT MEM| @ 57926km 34kph SOC=78% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255 W (141363) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #05: 4/40 rev0 G2 MEM Ef| @ 57926km 35kph SOC=78% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255 W (141373) v-twizy: OBD2 Cluster DTC NEW #06: 3/58 rev0 G2 INT MEM| @ 58711km 41kph SOC=46% BV=14V TC=0 IC=255
A manual multi frame poll:
I (147723) webcommand: HttpCommandStream[0x3f8540f4]: 3801804 bytes free, executing: x o r bm 2104 D (148323) vehicle: PollerSend(1): send [type=21, pid=4], expecting 79b/7bb-7bb D (148343) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=0 len=4 off=0 rem=70 D (148353) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=1 len=7 off=4 rem=63 D (148393) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=2 len=7 off=11 rem=56 D (148433) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=3 len=7 off=18 rem=49 D (148473) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=4 len=7 off=25 rem=42 D (148513) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=5 len=7 off=32 rem=35 D (148553) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=6 len=7 off=39 rem=28 D (148593) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=7 len=7 off=46 rem=21 D (148633) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=8 len=7 off=53 rem=14 D (148673) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=9 len=7 off=60 rem=7 D (148713) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS response 21(4) frm=10 len=7 off=67 rem=0 OVMS# x o r bm 2104 Response: 08 cc 3c 08 d4 3c 08 cb 3c 08 d6 3c 08 ce 3c 08 | ..<..<..<..<..<. d1 3c 08 d2 3c ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff | .<..<........... ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff | ................ ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff | ................ ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 3c 3c | ........<<
An example of the new error response handling:
I (165023) webcommand: HttpCommandStream[0x3f8479f4]: 3791052 bytes free, executing: x o r bm 221405 D (165323) vehicle: PollerSend(1): send [type=22, pid=1405], expecting 79b/7bb-7bb D (165343) vehicle: PollerReceive[7BB]: process OBD/UDS error 22(1405) code=11 OVMS# x o r bm 221405 ERROR: request failed with response error code 11
Code 11 = "serviceNotSupported" (see ISO 14229 Annex A.1 for more codes)
Feedback is welcome.
Regards, Michael
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev