Yeah, the roadster owners really need it there and it deliberately overrides the normal systems and sends by SMS. I would be reluctant to remove it. Regards, Mark.
On 19 Apr 2016, at 5:23 AM, Michael Balzer <dexter@expeedo.de> wrote:
Tom,
so the roadster doesn't cut off the battery to avoid deep discharging? Sounds like a bad BMS bug...
Ok, that's a very good reason why this kind of alert should be sent out on all channels available.
Thanks & regards, Michael
Am 18.04.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Tom Saxton:
Personally, I like having the second backup warning that doesn’t depend on a setting being right. It’s a big deal if our Roadster gets down to 5% accidentally.
Tom
On 4/18/16, 8:35 AM, "Michael Balzer" <ovmsdev-bounces@lists.teslaclub.hk on behalf of dexter@expeedo.de> wrote:
Hi everyone,
we've currently two low SOC alerts in the framework, one is the configurable (feature #9) min SOC alert in vehicle_ticker(), the other is the OVMS_SOCALERT code in net_state_ticker600().
The latter is fixed to 5% and does not respect user channel & notification configuration. Is there still a use case for this or is it obsolete?
Regards, Michael
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.teslaclub.hk http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.teslaclub.hk http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-- Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
<dexter.vcf>_______________________________________________ OvmsDev mailing list OvmsDev@lists.teslaclub.hk http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev