[Ovmsdev] TPMS Bug in ovms_server_v2.cpp?
Mark Webb-Johnson
mark at webb-johnson.net
Fri Mar 6 20:03:38 HKT 2020
Looks like an oversight. The spec says:
> Car TPMS message 0x57 “W”
> This message is sent <cartoserver> “C”, or <servertoapp> “s”, and transmits the last known TPMS values of the vehicle.
>
> <data> is comma-separated list of:
>
> front-right wheel pressure (psi)
> front-right wheel temperature (celcius)
> rear-right wheel pressure (psi)
> rear-right wheel temperature (celcius)
> front-left wheel pressure (psi)
> front-left wheel temperature (celcius)
> rear-left wheel pressure (psi)
> rear-left wheel temperature (celcius)
> Stale TPMS indicator (-1=none, 0=stale, >0 ok)
We can test the metrics to see if they are defined. If not, then set stale to -1. Should just be another line in the server v2 code.
Can you create a github issue, and I will fix. Or make the fix yourself and pull request?
Regards, Mark
> On 6 Mar 2020, at 6:31 PM, Chris van der Meijden <chris at arachnon.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> as I can't find the CAN-ID's for TPMS for the VW e-Up at the moment, I
> thought I just disable the feature, so the app won't display the TPMS
> boxes unnecessarily.
>
> In OVMS v2 this was possible by setting car_stale_tpms = -1 so the last
> number sent by the "W" message to the server was -1. With that -1 the
> app will not display the TMPS boxes.
>
> The code in ovms_server_v2.cpp for the message is now
>
> extram::ostringstream buffer;
> buffer
> << "MP-0 W"
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_fr_p->AsString("0",PSI)
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_fr_t->AsString("0")
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_rr_p->AsString("0",PSI)
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_rr_t->AsString("0")
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_fl_p->AsString("0",PSI)
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_fl_t->AsString("0")
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_rl_p->AsString("0",PSI)
> << ","
> << StandardMetrics.ms_v_tpms_rl_t->AsString("0")
> << ((stale)?",0":",1")
> ;
>
> Transmit(buffer.str().c_str());
>
> and that gives no room for sending a -1 as far as I understand it.
>
> Is this a bug, a feature, or am I missing something?
>
> Thanx for help
>
> Greetinx
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> OvmsDev mailing list
> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com
> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20200306/8252de1c/attachment.html>
More information about the OvmsDev
mailing list