[Ovmsdev] Ready for 3.2.009
Mark Webb-Johnson
mark at webb-johnson.net
Mon Feb 3 12:51:20 HKT 2020
Probably me triggering your update (a few minutes before I sent that eMail ). The normal update should be at 2am.
I normally use ‘ota status’ to see what is available/installed.
Regards, Mark.
> On 3 Feb 2020, at 12:46 PM, Greg D. <gregd2350 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmmpf. So, when are updates supposed to happen? I have it set to "2" in the GUI, presumably 2am local time. The update to 3.2.008-134 occurred at 02:05 on 2/2/2020. Then the android app says it updated to 3.2.009-1 at 16:15. If that wasn't you, then why the second update at that time?
>
> Currently the app says that 3.2.009-2 is available, as of 17:02. But the GUI says that I'm running 3.2.009-2 (the app has no record of this), and that 3.2.010 is available. When did you trigger the update?
>
> Confused...
>
> Greg
>
>
> Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:
>> Not sure. It was like that when I got to it.
>>
>> Firmware: 3.2.009-2-g39cdb7e/ota_0/edge (build idf v3.3-beta3-775-gdc1ca69 Feb 3 2020 09:00:33)
>> Running partition: ota_0
>> Boot partition: ota_0
>> Factory image: 3.1.001
>> OTA_O image: 3.2.009-2-g39cdb7e
>> OTA_1 image: 3.2.009-1-g92cc5ed
>> Server Available: 3.2.009-2-g39cdb7e (no update required)
>>
>> I think it all looks ok. You have the latest.
>>
>> It now looks ok, and probably worth squeezing these last few updates in. So, I will make a 3.2.010 now and release to EAP.
>>
>> Regards, Mark.
>>
>>> On 3 Feb 2020, at 10:49 AM, Greg D <gregd2350 at gmail.com <mailto:gregd2350 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Saw the update Metrics look good now. What changed?
>>>
>>> The module is reporting another update is pending for tonight. 3.2.009-2-g39cdb7e. Same version number...
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> On February 2, 2020 4:24:35 PM PST, Mark Webb-Johnson <mark at webb-johnson.net <mailto:mark at webb-johnson.net>> wrote:
>>> Greg,
>>>
>>> On the server I am seeing you running 3.2.008-134-ge6ac0c7/ota_0/edge and all the data looks fine. For example:
>>>
>>> ovms> metric list v.b
>>> ...
>>> Vehicle Response:
>>> v.b.12v.voltage 13.04V
>>> v.b.12v.voltage.ref 12.6V
>>> v.b.cac 136.777Ah
>>> v.b.consumption 0Wh/km
>>> v.b.current 1A
>>> v.b.health CAC 136.78Ah SOC 94% LIM 83% MIN 83% MAX 85%
>>> v.b.p.level.max 85%
>>> v.b.p.level.min 83%
>>> v.b.power 0.3985kW
>>> v.b.range.est 196.339km
>>> v.b.range.ideal 255.885km
>>> v.b.soc 95%
>>> v.b.soh 82.9213%
>>>
>>> ovms> metric list v.c
>>> ...
>>> Vehicle Response:
>>> v.c.charging no
>>> v.c.climit 24A
>>> v.c.current 0A
>>> v.c.duration.full 14Min
>>> v.c.kwh 9kWh
>>> v.c.mode standard
>>> v.c.pilot yes
>>> v.c.state done
>>> v.c.substate powerwait
>>> v.c.time 0Sec
>>> v.c.voltage 0V
>>>
>>> The temperature bug for Roadster is a known issue, and is fixed in 4082bb2a (and released in 3.2.009).
>>>
>>> I triggered an update for you (to 3.2.009-1-g92cc5ed), and that installed ok. I’ll try to find out if the temperature bug is fixed now or not.
>>>
>>> Regards, Mark.
>>>
>>>> On 3 Feb 2020, at 5:08 AM, Greg D. <gregd2350 at gmail.com <mailto:gregd2350 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Um, I just noticed that all the metrics except for the 12v battery
>>>> voltage are zero. The car is awake and charging right now, but hasn't
>>>> been driven since the software update to 3.2.008-134-ge6ac0c7, if that
>>>> matters. I believe the TPMS metrics don't update until it's driven, but
>>>> I should be seeing the temps. All gray and zero.
>>>>
>>>> I tried putting the car in Drive (just sitting there), and the TPMS data
>>>> came on after a few minutes. But the rest of the metrics are still zero
>>>> and gray.
>>>>
>>>> The VDS shows the correct temps, and is operating normally.
>>>>
>>>> Oops?
>>>>
>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greg D. wrote:
>>>>> My module updated to 3.2.008-134-ge6ac0c7 last night (2am local), and
>>>>> did the single update as it should. m.version is consistent with this.
>>>>> The module sees your 3.2.009-1-g92cc5ed as available. Presume it will
>>>>> update tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, all "go" from this console.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:
>>>>>> I’ve tagged 3.2.009 based on where we are today, and built on my edge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If no problems reported overnight, I’ll push to EAP tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Mark.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2 Feb 2020, at 6:21 PM, Michael Balzer <dexter at expeedo.de <mailto:dexter at expeedo.de>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 02.02.20 um 02:13 schrieb Mark Webb-Johnson:
>>>>>>>> Seems we are ready for another release. I made a number of fixes yesterday, and maybe able to make a few more today, then I am done and ready to release 3.2.009.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anything else to put in this?
>>>>>>> OK, nothing open here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards, Mark
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>>>>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
>>>>>>> Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>>>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>>>>>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>>>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This space for rent...
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OvmsDev mailing list
>> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com>
>> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OvmsDev mailing list
> OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com
> http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20200203/2b18006c/attachment.htm>
More information about the OvmsDev
mailing list