Yes, ^this.
The main repository master should be relatively
stable. If we need something potentially breaking, or a major
restructuring of how things are done, then we should do that in
a main repository branch. That is the reason for the upcoming
3.3 branch (as it restructures the modem driver, which could be
potentially very breaking - more on this later, when I am ready
to release).
Preparing stuff for inclusion in the main repository
should in general be done in local clone copies, then
pull-requests made when ready.
Regards, Mark
PS: On a second thought I kinda cannot see
the advantage of a PR request into a Dev branch in
comparison into the master branch.
If the PR is changed and improved until it is approved
by you guys it should be OK to go into the master.
On 17 August 2020 07:00:37
CEST, Soko <
ovms@soko.cc> wrote:
Hi Derek.
I would prefer the first option as discussing source
is way easier on a PR in github as here in the
mailing list.
Soko
On 17 August 2020 06:53:40
CEST, Derek Caudwell <
d.caudwell@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Would it possible to
have a 'Dev' branch in the main repository
for those of us needing assistance to get a
feature to the point it can be merged into
the 'Master'?
If that's not
preferred and we use a branch on our own
github clone, is it as simple as providing
the link to the branch on this email list to
invite others to collaborate/review?
With the latter approach
we may miss out on input from others not
actively monitoring this forum I guess.
Regards Derek
_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev