Yes, this should be the standard (for any command that implements ’status’).

I implemented this in the for-v3.3 branch. The following are affected:


I notice that there are a few subsystems that don’t have a ’status’ command at all. Perhaps that should be standardised as well?

Regards, Mark.

On 1 Sep 2020, at 2:03 AM, Craig Leres <leres@xse.com> wrote:

Given that "simcom" defaults to "simcom status" (and you must use "simcom ?" to see all sub-commands) would it be reasonable for "location" to default to "location status"?

Craig
_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev