But it shouldn't be hard to add support for this, as it basically
just fills the first frame byte from the lower 8 bits of the TX and
RX IDs, reduces the payload size by one byte and shifts the offsets
by one. PollerSend() and PollerReceive() need to be extended for
this, and poll_pid_t needs to be extended by an addressing scheme
tag.
I don't think that the extra byte is included in the replies. (Would help if I could get a reply...):
I suddenly got a whole lot of warning logged:
W (3516211) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3516261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 10 09 62 dd bc 02 ea | ...b....
W (3518201) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3518261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 05 62 dd 68 93 85 00 | ..b.h...
W (3530211) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3530261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 10 09 62 dd bc 02 eb | ...b....
W (3532211) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3532261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 05 62 dd 68 93 86 00 | ..b.h...
W (3544211) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3544261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 10 09 62 dd bc 02 eb | ...b....
W (3546201) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3546261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 05 62 dd 68 93 87 00 | ..b.h...
W (3558211) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3558261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 10 09 62 dd bc 02 eb | ...b....
W (3560201) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 03 7f 22 78 00 00 00 | ..."x...
W (3560261) vehicle: PollerReceive[607]: ignoring unknown/invalid ISO TP frame: f1 05 62 dd 68 93 88 00 | ..b.h...
In there I can see "f1 10 09 62 dd bc 02 eb" 0x02eb = 747 = 74.7% - so there is the SOC. :-)
and "f1 05 62 dd 68 93 88 00" 0x9388 = 37768 = 377.68 volts - so there is the battery voltage.
So it looks like the receivepacket does need to be adjusted too - that f1 I guess is OUR "extended address".