I have been using a similar adapter for 2 years with Chevrolet Volt. Different PCB but same schematic, gpio pins, the swan module (swcan.cpp). I have no problem with it.

ср, 18 мая 2022 г. в 09:43, Craig Leres <leres@xse.com>:
On 5/17/22 17:55, Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:
>
> Regarding:
> https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/issues/704
> <https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/issues/704>
>
> Marko did some work on the back in 2019, and helpfully published under
> MIT license here:
>
>     https://github.com/mjuhanne/OVMS-SWCAN
>     <https://github.com/mjuhanne/OVMS-SWCAN>
>
>
> Very grateful for that.
>
> Now, the Bolt EV people are asking for this.
>
> In general, it seems that we can do a simple board in the same way as
> the K-Line was done. Use the two available GPIOs (one for INT and the
> other CS). Then the GPIOs on the MCP2515 to control the transceiver
> mode. Expose the single SWCAN pin on the DB9, in the same way as K-Line
> does it. GND (for SWCAN-low) is already available there.
>
> Anybody see any problems with that approach?
>
> I am happy to arrange the hardware, given sufficient interest, but have
> almost no way of testing (as none of the cars I have access to have SWCAN).

I would like to support this work and can test with my Cadillac. I also
have a couple of the ovms protoboards and could probably build my own
hardware to test with.

                Craig
_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev