<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Chris,<br>
<br>
as you changed two parameters at once, you cannot currently tell
which helped.<br>
<br>
I suggest keeping the improved 12V level and returning to the old
CAN timing to see if that makes a difference.<br>
<br>
Reviewing your report & findings, I'd say your issue was caused
by the 12V dips.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 11.04.25 um 20:01 schrieb Chris Box:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:010b01962603248a-fadd4fa6-ad95-43d3-bdb2-912670f09902-000000@eu-west-2.amazonses.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p id="reply-intro">On 2025-04-06 11:03, Michael Balzer via
OvmsDev wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div id="replybody1">Did the changed CAN timing to better follow
the SAE recommendations actually have any benefits?</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I haven't experienced any Leaf errors using the SAE timing
over the past month. As a result my intention is to continue
with this new timing, although I can't prove the timing is the
reason for the lack of issues. I also improved 12 volt levels.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you're looking for hard data, please advise what I should
do to gather that data. It's not particularly clear to me,
because I understand that "normal" can bus statistics for the
Leaf include some expected errors.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div>Chris</div>
<p><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Michael Balzer * Am Rahmen 5 * D-58313 Herdecke
Fon 02330 9104094 * Handy 0176 20698926</pre>
</body>
</html>