<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Greg,<br>
    <br>
    the task is messaged to, not called by the CAN framework, it runs as
    soon as it is created.<br>
    <br>
    Regards,<br>
    Michael<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 23.05.2018 um 22:16 schrieb Greg D.:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:85b245c9-3457-327d-667e-c17db79a6d67@gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      Ha, that's interesting.  I've pushed a fix to swap the ordering,
      but am not quite convinced that this is the issue.  The order of
      creation shouldn't matter because the OBD2ECU task doesn't
      register itself as a listener until after both are done.  So why
      would it even be called?  <br>
      <br>
      Greg<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Michael Balzer wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:3805f0c8-f5fd-0cb9-9708-5de311a6b856@expeedo.de">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=utf-8">
        Greg,<br>
        <br>
        I just had a look. That crash is simply due to an initialization
        order mistake in your constructor, has nothing to do with the
        CAN bus: you create the m_rxqueue _after_ starting the
        OBD2ECU_task, which uses the m_rxqueue:<br>
        <br>
        <tt>static void OBD2ECU_task(void *pvParameters)</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  {</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  obd2ecu *me = (obd2ecu*)pvParameters;</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  CAN_frame_t frame;</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  while(1)</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>    {</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>    if (xQueueReceive(me-><b>m_rxqueue</b>,
          &frame, (portTickType)portMAX_DELAY)==pdTRUE)</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>      {</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>      // Only handle incoming frames on our CAN bus</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>      if (frame.origin == me->m_can)
          me->IncomingFrame(&frame);</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>      }</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>    }</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  }</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>obd2ecu::obd2ecu(const char* name, canbus* can)</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  : pcp(name)</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  {</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  m_can = can;</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>  xTaskCreatePinnedToCore(OBD2ECU_task, "OVMS OBDII
          ECU", 6144, (void*)this, 5, &m_task, 1);</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt><br>
        </tt><b><tt>  m_rxqueue = xQueueCreate(20,sizeof(CAN_frame_t));</tt></b><tt><br>
        </tt><tt><br>
        </tt><tt>…</tt><tt><br>
        </tt><br>
        <br>
        So the task can reach the xQueueReceive() call before the queue
        is actually usable.<br>
        <br>
        Regards,<br>
        Michael<br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 23.05.2018 um 03:29 schrieb Greg
          D.:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:33670a15-78c3-a1bc-95a4-07034c7193fb@gmail.com">
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          Hi Mark,<br>
          <br>
          Yeah, big shrug here too.  It occurs infrequently, during what
          was a reboot anyway, and the system recovered itself, so this
          isn't a critical issue unless it keeps happening (i.e. a
          crash/reboot loop).  I suppose it could also occur with a
          frame coming in from a HUD, though that CAN bus is on a
          different interface chip so if the cause is hardware
          dependent, it might not occur.<br>
          <br>
          Perhaps we need to not launch the higher level applications
          (e.g. OBD2ECU) until maybe the 5 second mark, when we know the
          system is initialized and otherwise pretty stable, but within
          that "Early" timeframe?  Just a thought,<br>
          <br>
          Greg<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite"
            cite="mid:B296C17D-71F0-4486-B59A-065AA23690FB@webb-johnson.net">
            <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
              charset=utf-8">
            Greg,
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">Yes, the MyCan.RegisterListener(m_rxqueue)
              will register for all messages on all CAN buses.</div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">I am trying to work out a neat way of adding
              filters to this (both hardware and software). Some easy
              standard way of filtering traffic in a standard way (like
              the BFP filters in Unix variants do for ethernet traffic).
              That will give us a performance boost for things like
              odb2ecu, retools, etc.</div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">But you already have a "if (frame.origin ==
              me->m_can)”, so not sure how this could be affecting
              you?</div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">
              <blockquote type="cite" class="">What precisely is "early"
                in the context of a boot crash?  That would put a bound
                on the size and location of the timing window.</blockquote>
            </div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">10 seconds, I believe. You can see it with the
              message "I (10576) housekeeping: System considered stable
              (RAM: 8b=99060-99176 32b=20)” about 10 seconds into the
              boot.</div>
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">Regards, Mark.<br class="">
              <div><br class="">
                <blockquote type="cite" class="">
                  <div class="">On 23 May 2018, at 7:55 AM, Greg D. <<a
                      href="mailto:gregd2350@gmail.com" class=""
                      moz-do-not-send="true">gregd2350@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:</div>
                  <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                  <div class="">
                    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
                      charset=utf-8" class="">
                    <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class=""> Hi
                      Michael,<br class="">
                      <br class="">
                      Correct, not a config issue.  I had assumed it was
                      a race condition (first time I've seen it), but
                      didn't realize it involved my code.  Yikes!<br
                        class="">
                      <br class="">
                      This is the call-back into the OBD2ECU task when a
                      CAN frame is received in the system.  Apparently
                      everyone looking for a CAN frame gets called when
                      a frame is received from any bus, and each process
                      needs to filter out the ones they own.  So,
                      somehow a CAN frame was seen to have been received
                      before the system was fully initialized.  Perhaps
                      something dropped into the hardware buffer after
                      the chip was turned on, but not before the O/S had
                      gotten everything situated for handling it.  I
                      don't currently have anything connected to the
                      OBDII CAN bus (CAN3) on my module, so this must
                      have been a frame from the car itself on CAN 1. 
                      CAN 2 is not used in my car.<br class="">
                      <br class="">
                      What precisely is "early" in the context of a boot
                      crash?  That would put a bound on the size and
                      location of the timing window.<br class="">
                      <br class="">
                      Greg<br class="">
                      <br class="">
                      <br class="">
                      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Michael Balzer wrote:<br
                          class="">
                      </div>
                      <blockquote type="cite"
                        cite="mid:6a8db28c-03ba-2952-d802-d720e6dd2deb@expeedo.de"
                        class="">
                        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
                          content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
                        Greg,<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        the backtrace says the crash happened here:<br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <tt class="">0x4008f6de is in vTaskEnterCritical
(/Users/mark/esp/esp-idf/components/freertos/include/freertos/portmacro.h:283).<br
                            class="">
                          278     * Warning: From the ISA docs: in some
                          (unspecified) cases, the s32c1i instruction
                          may return the<br class="">
                          279     * *bitwise inverse* of the old mem if
                          the mem wasn't written. This doesn't seem to
                          happen on the<br class="">
                          280     * ESP32 (portMUX assertions would
                          fail).<br class="">
                          281     */<br class="">
                          282    static inline void
                          uxPortCompareSet(volatile uint32_t *addr,
                          uint32_t compare, uint32_t *set) {<br class="">
                          283        __asm__ __volatile__ (<br class="">
                          284            "WSR         %2,SCOMPARE1 \n"<br
                            class="">
                          285            "S32C1I     %0, %1, 0     \n"<br
                            class="">
                          286            :"=r"(*set)<br class="">
                          287            :"r"(addr), "r"(compare),
                          "0"(*set)<br class="">
                          0x4008eb10 is in xQueueGenericReceive
                          (/Users/mark/esp/esp-idf/components/freertos/./queue.c:1455).<br
                            class="">
                          1450        statements within the function
                          itself.  This is done in the interest<br
                            class="">
                          1451        of execution time efficiency. */<br
                            class="">
                          1452    <br class="">
                          1453        for( ;; )<br class="">
                          1454        {<br class="">
                          1455           
                          taskENTER_CRITICAL(&pxQueue->mux);<br
                            class="">
                          1456            {<br class="">
                          1457                /* Is there data in the
                          queue now?  To be running the calling task<br
                            class="">
                          1458                must be    the highest
                          priority task wanting to access the queue. */<br
                            class="">
                          1459                if(
                          pxQueue->uxMessagesWaiting > (
                          UBaseType_t ) 0 )<br class="">
                          <b class="">0x4011f3fd is in
                            OBD2ECU_task(void*)
(/Users/mark/Documents/ovms/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/vehicle/OVMS.V3/components/obd2ecu/src/obd2ecu.cpp:155).</b></tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">150      obd2ecu *me =
                          (obd2ecu*)pvParameters;</tt><tt class=""><br
                            class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">151    </tt><tt class=""><br
                            class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">152      CAN_frame_t frame;</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">153      while(1)</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">154        {</tt><tt class=""><br
                            class="">
                        </tt><b class=""><tt class="">155        if
                            (xQueueReceive(me->m_rxqueue, &frame,
                            (portTickType)portMAX_DELAY)==pdTRUE)</tt></b><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">156          {</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">157          // Only handle
                          incoming frames on our CAN bus</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">158          if (frame.origin
                          == me->m_can)
                          me->IncomingFrame(&frame);</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><tt class="">159          }</tt><tt
                          class=""><br class="">
                        </tt><br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        So I assume that's the same bug I already
                        reported in issue #103:<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/issues/103"
                          moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/issues/103</a><br
                          class="">
                        <br class="">
                        …and as it now happened to you, I assume it's
                        not configuration related. Can you verify my
                        assumption?<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <blockquote type="cite" class="">Looks like an
                          init race condition, i.e. m_rxqueue used in
                          undefined state.</blockquote>
                        <br class="">
                        Regards,<br class="">
                        Michael<br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 22.05.2018 um
                          19:24 schrieb Greg D.:<br class="">
                        </div>
                        <blockquote type="cite"
                          cite="mid:45c73f38-dcea-9bac-7b5a-bedc8e08617d@gmail.com"
                          class="">
                          <pre class="" wrap="">Just noticed this on my production 3.1 module.  Was this an artifact of the 
upgrade from .005 to .006?

Last boot was 140983 second(s) ago
Time at boot: 2018-05-20 19:05:59 PDT
This is reset #17 since last power cycle
Detected boot reason: EarlyCrash (12/12)
Crash counters: 1 total, 1 early
Last crash: StoreProhibited exception on core 1
Registers:
PC : 0x4008f6de PS : 0x00060033 A0 : 0x8008eb13 A1 : 0x3ffd6150
A2 : 0xfefeff4e A3 : 0x0000abab A4 : 0xb33fffff A5 : 0x00000001
A6 : 0x00060020 A7 : 0x0000cdcd A8 : 0x0000abab A9 : 0x3ffd6150
A10 : 0x00000003 A11 : 0x00060023 A12 : 0x00060020 A13 : 0x3ffb4188
A14 : 0x000001e8 A15 : 0x00001800 SAR : 0x00000000 EXCCAUSE: 0x0000001d
EXCVADDR: 0xfefeff4e LBEG : 0x00000000 LEND : 0x00000000 LCOUNT : 0x00000000
Backtrace:
0x4008f6de 0x4008eb10 0x4011f3fd 0x40174f95 0x400e73be 0x400e4699 0x40085149 
0x40128bc2 0x40128df7 0x401287b4 0x400ea22d 0x400eac7a 0x400ead09 0x400ead19 
0x402207d6 0x400e9ece 0x400e9f79 0x400e45f5 0x400e4604 0x400f5c09 0x400f035d
Version: 3.1.006/ota_0/main (build idf v3.1-dev-455-gf4905cdf May 20 2018 20:08:31)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running partition: ota_0
Boot partition: ota_0
Firmware: 3.1.006/ota_0/main (build idf v3.1-dev-455-gf4905cdf May 20 2018 20:08:31)
</pre>
                          <!--'"--><br class="">
                          <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                          <br class="">
                          <pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br class="">
                        <pre class="moz-signature" cols="160">-- 
Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
</pre>
                        <br class="">
                        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                        <br class="">
                        <pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br class="">
                    </div>
                    _______________________________________________<br
                      class="">
                    OvmsDev mailing list<br class="">
                    <a href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com"
                      class="" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a><br
                      class="">
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                      href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a><br
                      class="">
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br class="">
            </div>
            <br>
            <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
            <br>
            <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          <!--'"--><br>
          <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <br>
          <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <pre class="moz-signature" cols="160">-- 
Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
</pre>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
        <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com" moz-do-not-send="true">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <!--'"--><br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com">OvmsDev@lists.openvehicles.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev">http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="160">-- 
Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
</pre>
  </body>
</html>