[Ovmsdev] Double updates - Normal?

Thomas Heuer egon at heuer-humfeld.de
Thu Jan 30 19:54:09 HKT 2020


The issue was on boot, the events: SignalEvent: queue overflow, event 'system.start' dropped in some case.

 

the problem was the egpio settings in OvmsVehicleSmartED::ConfigChanged(OvmsConfigParam* param)

 

https://github.com/Dimitrie78/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/commit/21e1a0339c029adf5c746dfd6fecddbc9455a947#diff-9106f33dff1f6160884b2e78d145607fL155-L160

line 155 – 160

 

Von: OvmsDev <ovmsdev-bounces at lists.openvehicles.com> Im Auftrag von Mark Webb-Johnson
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2020 11:35
An: OVMS Developers <ovmsdev at lists.openvehicles.com>
Betreff: Re: [Ovmsdev] Double updates - Normal?

 

Just had a thought.

 

Events used to be synchronous, but we switched to deliver in a different task. Maybe the startup sequence relies on that in some way.





On 30 Jan 2020, at 6:32 PM, Mark Webb-Johnson <mark at webb-johnson.net <mailto:mark at webb-johnson.net> > wrote:



Seems identical. The changes don’t seem to affect the dispatch of the system.start event.

 

I think it must be a race condition.

 

Mark





On 30 Jan 2020, at 5:56 PM, Michael Balzer <dexter at expeedo.de <mailto:dexter at expeedo.de> > wrote:

 

Mark,

a similar issue was happening on some Smart ED and fixed by Dimitrie later on:

https://github.com/openvehicles/Open-Vehicle-Monitoring-System-3/issues/293

I thought that was a Smart specific issue, maybe I was wrong.

Regards,
Michael


Am 30.01.20 um 06:17 schrieb Mark Webb-Johnson:

Still stumped… 

 

The OTA code doesn’t call GetOVMSVersion(), but instead just looks at StandardMetrics.ms_m_version (which we know is blank). That is why this is happening.

 

But why is StandardMetrics.ms_m_version empty (as is the hardware value as well).

 

The ovms_version code hooks into ’system.start’ event, and sets the version and hardware metrics. So, obviously that is not being called. That event is raised just after ’Starting USB console…”. The event is also listened to be ovms_time, ovms_mdns, and swcan.

 

MDNS outputs “Starting MDNS” when it sees that. The ovms_time sets the environment variable TZ. Your car is showing:

 

ovms> time status

...

Vehicle Response:

  Time Zone:  Not defined

  UTC Time:   2020-01-30 05:00:53 UTC

  Local Time: 2020-01-30 05:00:53 GMT

  Provider:   None

 

So looks like TZ is not being set. Presumably that means the call is not happening. I had a look at the ovms_events code, but can’t find anything obvious.

 

So, tried a hacky test:

 

ovms> metric list version

...

Vehicle Response:

  m.version

 

ovms> event raise system.start

...

Vehicle Response:

  Raising event: system.start

 

ovms> metric list version

...

Vehicle Response:

  m.version                                3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe/ota_0/edge (build idf v3.3-beta3-775-gdc1ca69 Jan 29 2020 00:00:52)

 

ovms> ota status

...

Vehicle Response:

  Firmware:          3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe/ota_0/edge (build idf v3.3-beta3-775-gdc1ca69 Jan 29 2020 00:00:52)

  Running partition: ota_0

  Boot partition:    ota_0

  Factory image:     3.1.001

  OTA_O image:       3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe

  OTA_1 image:       3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe

  Server Available:  3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe (no update required)

 

🤢

 

Can you try to boot from USB (module reset) and provide the serial boot log? Particularly around the lines ’Starting USB console’.

 

Maybe a race condition at startup, or some other issue delivering events early on?

 

Only other thing I see are some scripts on /store/events regarding vehicle on/off - perhaps you can try disabling those to see if they trigger the issue? I tried recreating them on my box, but couldn’t repeat your problem.

 

Regards, Mark.





On 30 Jan 2020, at 11:55 AM, Mark Webb-Johnson <mark at webb-johnson.net <mailto:mark at webb-johnson.net> > wrote:

 

Greg, 

 

It seems your car can’t pickup currently running firmware version:

 

ovms> open ROADSTER834B

Connected and logged in to ROADSTER834B

ovms> metric list version

...

Vehicle Response:

  m.version

 

By comparison, here’s mine:

 

ovms> metric list version

...

Vehicle Response:

  m.version                                3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe/ota_1/edge (build idf v3.3-beta3-775-gdc1ca69 Jan 29 2020 00:00:52)

ovms> ota status

...

Vehicle Response:

  Firmware:          3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe/ota_1/edge (build idf v3.3-beta3-775-gdc1ca69 Jan 29 2020 00:00:52)

  Running partition: ota_1

  Boot partition:    ota_1

  Factory image:     3.2.002

  OTA_O image:       3.2.008-120-gcfb7864

  OTA_1 image:       3.2.008-121-g4c6c9fe

 

Your m.hardware metric is also blank.

 

I’ll keep looking, but at the moment this seems bizarre.

 

Regards, Mark.





On 30 Jan 2020, at 11:21 AM, Greg D. <gregd2350 at gmail.com <mailto:gregd2350 at gmail.com> > wrote:

 

Hi Mark, Michael,

Seems like what is happening is that the module keeps thinking a new
update is available.  Today was especially active for some reason. 
Screenshot of the Android application's log screen, attached.  All
versions appear to be the same.  The car has simply been sitting in the
garage on WiFi; no transitions of network access.

Output of 'ota status' attached as well.

Sorry, but I don't appear to have logging enabled. What specifically
would you like logged?

Greg


Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:



Not normal. Can you send us the logs. Also the output of ‘ota status’ would be helpful.

Are you sure this isn't just a notification of the update, and is the update itself? Perhaps a screenshot of the double notifications you receive?

Regards, Mark.




On 25 Jan 2020, at 11:35 AM, Greg D. <gregd2350 at gmail.com <mailto:gregd2350 at gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi folks,

I moved my car's OVMSv3 to the Edge firmware a bit ago, and notice that
every update seems to be doubled.  Besides being a bit annoying, it ends
up without a previous version to fall back to since both partitions end
up being the same.

Is this behavior normal?  Can it be prevented?

I'm only on Edge because of the bug in obd2ecu, and will probably move
to EAP after we get an EAP build with the fix in it.  Is the behavior
the same there?

I used to be on Main, and all seemed fine there.

Thanks,

Greg

_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev

_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev


<Repeated updates.png><Repeated updates ota status output.txt>_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev

 

 





_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev






-- 
Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26

_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev

_______________________________________________
OvmsDev mailing list
OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.openvehicles.com> 
http://lists.openvehicles.com/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20200130/b8c3d144/attachment.htm>


More information about the OvmsDev mailing list