[Ovmsdev] Reducing wifi/netmanager log messages

Stephen Casner casner at acm.org
Fri Jan 11 14:45:22 HKT 2019


Mark,

Yes, my unit is set to connect only to my home network.  But even when
set to scan it is unlikely to connect while driving.

Rather than suppressing the netmanager work I was proposing to just
suppress the messages if they would repeat from the previous time.

                                                        -- Steve

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019, Mark Webb-Johnson wrote:

> Steve,
>
> Presumably, you are set to connect to a particular wifi access point? (not scanning client mode).
>
> It would be good to suppress the netmanager work if the link was already disconnected (or suppress the messages if the interface priority doesn't change, as a more general solution?). Same for the STA disconnection.
>
> Regards, Mark.
>
> > On 11 Jan 2019, at 6:17 AM, Stephen Casner <casner at acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > When driving, and therefore out of range of the home wifi, the
> > following messges emitted every 10 seconds will fill up the log:
> >
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:36.839) netmanager: Interface priority is pp2 (10.170.41.247/255.255.255.255 gateway 10.64.64.64)
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:36.889) netmanager: Set DNS#0 8.8.8.8
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:36.939) netmanager: Set DNS#1 8.8.4.4
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:36.989) esp32wifi: STA disconnected with reason 201
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:46.839) netmanager: Interface priority is pp2 (10.170.41.247/255.255.255.255 gateway 10.64.64.64)
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:46.899) netmanager: Set DNS#0 8.8.8.8
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:46.949) netmanager: Set DNS#1 8.8.4.4
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:46.999) esp32wifi: STA disconnected with reason 201
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:56.839) netmanager: Interface priority is pp2 (10.170.41.247/255.255.255.255 gateway 10.64.64.64)
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:56.889) netmanager: Set DNS#0 8.8.8.8
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:56.939) netmanager: Set DNS#1 8.8.4.4
> > I (2019-01-04 03:46:56.979) esp32wifi: STA disconnected with reason 201
> >
> > I'd like to add code to suppress those messages when there is no
> > change in state.  Any objections?
> >
> >                                                        -- Steve


More information about the OvmsDev mailing list