[Ovmsdev] Console logging / CAN tracing

Michael Balzer dexter at expeedo.de
Sat Dec 30 06:31:36 HKT 2017


Stephen,

I'll change the CAN tracing tomorrow.

Log output on the async console is sufficient for now. Maybe if we get SD cards running, we can write the log also into a file.

Regards,
Michael


Am 29.12.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Stephen Casner:
> Michael,
>
> The right fix is to change the CAN tracing to gather its output into a
> buffer so complete lines get logged.
>
> The ESP_LOG macros get redirected through our logging system as well,
> but (currently) only to the async console rather than all consoles.
> Is logging of CAN traces to telnet/SSH sessions desired?  How about
> other logging?
>
> There may also be some ways to improve handling of full-queue
> conditions to degrade more gracefully.
>
>                                                         -- Steve
>
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Michael Balzer wrote:
>
>> I've found a strange issue with console logging and/or especially
>> CAN tracing:
>>
>> If CAN tracing is enabled and a and that sends CAN frames and runs
>> longer than about a second (?) (i.e. "co can1 scan"), the trace
>> output first becomes garbled, the command will need much longer than
>> usual to finish, and after returning to the prompt, the hex and
>> single char output of the trace is split into separate outputs,
>> coming one per second (running for a while), intermixing with the
>> shell prompt. Also trace output gets garbled especially on a
>> parallel telnet session.
>>
>> I suspect that's due to the UART queue becoming full, and the
>> console logger doing xQueueSendToBack() with 1000 ms timeouts.
>>
>> Every hex dump byte is logged by a separate call to
>> MyCommandApp.Log(). If the queue is full, every single call gets
>> delayed for a second ...adding up to block the console for as many
>> seconds as there are calls...? (unverified theory)
>>
>>> As proposed, I will change the script code to use BufferedShell and
>>> also change how console_logger() is done so I can remove the
>>> problematic OvmsConsole::Log() function.  Then puts() will work again,
>>> too.
>>>                                                         -- Steve
>> Is this related? I.e. should the CAN trace output be done using
>> ESP_LOG instead of MyCommandApp.Log()?
>>
>> If so I can take care of that...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> --
>> Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
>> Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26
> _______________________________________________
> OvmsDev mailing list
> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk
> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev

-- 
Michael Balzer * Helkenberger Weg 9 * D-58256 Ennepetal
Fon 02333 / 833 5735 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26




More information about the OvmsDev mailing list