[Ovmsdev] Add ChaDeMo and CSS to car_chargemode
Gregory PETIT
gregory21 at free.fr
Wed Dec 9 19:58:51 HKT 2015
Une petite chose a tu retrouvé le lien du Pickit 2 que tu utilisais ? car celui pro sur le site de microchip… soit le Pickit V2.53 ou bien meme le V2.61 ne fonctionne pas possible de programer…. sur le V2.53 je n’ai pas le PIC dans la liste des devices id….. sur le V2.61 j’ai bien le PIC18F2685 mais la programmation ne fonctionne pas…… je ne comprend pas…… j’ai essayé le PIC 3 et lui me dit qui faut une alimentation supplémentaire… j’ai donc fourni du 12V depuis la prise ODB mais idem…… une idée?
> Le 9 déc. 2015 à 10:37, Mark Webb-Johnson <mark at webb-johnson.net> a écrit :
>
> Or
>
> car_chargetype
>
> Mark
>
> On 9 Dec 2015, at 4:44 PM, Geir Øyvind Vælidalo <geir at validalo.net <mailto:geir at validalo.net>> wrote:
>
>> Robert, maybe this is something you could do? As your first task in OVMS? :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Geir
>>
>> Sendt fra min iPhone
>>
>> Den 9. des. 2015 kl. 07.50 skrev Mark Webb-Johnson <mark at webb-johnson.net <mailto:mark at webb-johnson.net>>:
>>
>>> Yep, please steer clear of the car_chargermode variable. That is really badly named and is more an operation mode (like Eco/Normal on a Prius, for example). I think it is named as it is because the source on the roadster is the charger message.
>>>
>>> I suggest:
>>>
>>> unsigned char car_chargeplug;
>>>
>>> and setup an enumeration as desired. Create it in ovms.{h,c} and then add it on the end of the ’S’ message.
>>>
>>> If someone wants to commit that and send in a pull request, I’ll accept (and update the protocol guide myself).
>>>
>>> Regards, Mark.
>>>
>>>> On 9 Dec 2015, at 3:10 AM, Robert Cotran <robert at cotran.ca <mailto:robert at cotran.ca>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I like the idea of having charge type for logging purposes.
>>>>
>>>> I agree it shouldn't be combined with the Roadster charging types.
>>>>
>>>> Can just create a new "field" called connector type?
>>>>
>>>> On 12/8/2015 2:07 PM, Nikki Gordon-Bloomfield wrote:
>>>>> Charge type would become important if you were automatically sending charge session data back (anonymously) to the OCM database…
>>>>> ᐧ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nikki Gordon-Bloomfield
>>>>> about.me/aminorjourney
>>>>> <https://about.me/aminorjourney?promo=email_sig>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Tom Saxton <tom at idleloop.com <mailto:tom at idleloop.com>> wrote:
>>>>> The chargemode currently encodes software charging profiles, based on what the Roadster offers. It's similar to what the early Leafs offered, charging to full or charge to 80%, but more complex setting both a charging limit and target battery temperature ranges.
>>>>>
>>>>> What you are proposing adding is to encode the charging connection type, which is a different kind of thing, orthogonal to the car's chosen charging profile.
>>>>>
>>>>> A Roadster can charge in any of the four profiles from either a Level 1 connection (120V, 12A to 16A) or Level 2 (208V to 240V at up to 70A), for example Standard mode on Level 1 or Range mode on Level 2. So, you can't encode both a charging profile and a connection type with a single number. A Leaf is similar in how those two interact.
>>>>>
>>>>> To me, the interesting thing is more the charge rate (V/A or kW) more than which connector my car uses. I don't need OVMS to tell me how I plugged in, but I do care about knowing how fast it's charging.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/8/15, 10:19 AM, "Geir Øyvind Vælidalo" < <mailto:ovmsdev-bounces at lists.teslaclub.hk>ovmsdev-bounces at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:ovmsdev-bounces at lists.teslaclub.hk> on behalf of geir at validalo.net <mailto:geir at validalo.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Hi guys,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I would like to have ChaDeMo and CSS added to car_chargemode, and maybe Type 1 and Type 2 too. Then we can display those names in the apps and maybe even add images for those charge plugs.
>>>>> >I would propose this:
>>>>> >0x00 - Standard
>>>>> >0x01 - Storage
>>>>> >0x02 - ???
>>>>> >0x03 - Range
>>>>> >0x04 - Performance
>>>>> >0x05 - ChaDeMo
>>>>> >0x06 - CSS
>>>>> >0x07 - J1772 Type 1
>>>>> >0x08 - Mennekes Type 2
>>>>> >
>>>>> >What to you guys think? Would it be problematic for the server and/or apps if suddenly the Kia Souls stated sending chargemode 0x05?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Best regards,
>>>>> >Geir
>>>>> >
>>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>>> >OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>> >OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>>>>> >http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>>>>> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>>> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>>>>> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>>> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>>>> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OvmsDev mailing list
>>> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>>> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OvmsDev mailing list
>> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk <mailto:OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk>
>> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev <http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev>
> _______________________________________________
> OvmsDev mailing list
> OvmsDev at lists.teslaclub.hk
> http://lists.teslaclub.hk/mailman/listinfo/ovmsdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20151209/e7de6ed5/attachment.htm>
More information about the OvmsDev
mailing list