[Ovmsdev] some partial success

[Michael Balzer]

Nikolay, Mark,

Am 02.01.2013 19:28, schrieb Nikolay Shishkov:
>
>             can_2_soc2 = ((unsigned int) can_databuffer[4] << 8) + 
> can_databuffer[5];
> Initially I got the 5th and 6th array elements, but noticed that I had 
> it wrong... so I changed to 4th and 5th...
>
> And finally at the debug sms handler:
>     s = stp_i  ( s, " SOC=",   can_2_soc2 );
>
> I changed the strings abit and can see that the new code is running, 
> but do not understand how come a completely different values are 
> reported - the value is from can_databuffer[5] and can_databuffer[6].
> So the 301 contains the following bytes (viewed with PCAN) 00 00 0e 7d 
> 01 b2 0a 4a.
> The SOC is supposed to be in 0E7D (actually it is the DOD), but I am 
> getting the 0AB2 in the can_2_soc2 value.

I don't know PCAN, but the CAN byte numbering normally begins at 0 on 
the left, so 0e in your example is can_databuffer[2] and 7d is ...[3].

If you get 0AB2, that would be [6][5] = your initial code?

Btw: we could solve variable name conflicts between vehicle modules by 
introducing some namespace prefix (replacing "can_") like Mark already 
did for the functions. I'd shorten that for vars to e.g. "vrt_" for 
"vehicle renault twizy", accordingly "vtc_" for the Think and so on. OK, 
Mark?

Regards,
Michael

-- 
Michael Balzer * Paradestr. 8 * D-42107 Wuppertal
Fon 0202 / 272 2201 * Handy 0176 / 206 989 26

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20130102/4234190a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dexter.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openvehicles.com/pipermail/ovmsdev/attachments/20130102/4234190a/attachment-0002.vcf>